- Hide menu

Co Production Agreement Definition

Co-production can provide a valuable way to finance production and gain experience. However, as with any agreement where each party has complex rights and obligations, it is important to conclude a contract as soon as possible in order to resolve the most important issues for each party. The Canadian study found evidence that, in television projects, national joint ventures performed better than international joint ventures. However, in the case of large budget projects, it has been found that national joint ventures are not a viable alternative to international joint ventures. [20] In their subsequent study of co-production in Australia, the authors cited financial pooling as the main benefit and increased coordination costs as the main drawback. [21] This indicates that co-production is more suited to larger budget productions, particularly for films that need more capital but do not bear the same dollar-per-dollar coordination costs as smaller projects. Normally, it is the producer who created the idea that will do it. However, if one producer contributes much more to the budget than the other, it also influences the choice of the managing manufacturer. The appointment of this person should not be a substitute for a statement on the respective roles and responsibilities of producers in the co-production agreement, nor an agreement on the extent to which producers should consult and obtain authorization for what they do during production and the method of obtaining that consent/authorization, particularly when producers are in different countries. It is also important to determine at an early stage the responsibilities and rewards that co-production will have for each co-producer.

Even if the financial plan and budget are not yet ready, it is at least important to reach an agreement in principle: it is better to know earlier if your impression of what you are doing and that you are being paid corresponds to that of your co-production partner. To take advantage of these profits in England, film companies would create production companies using the necessary quantities of British technicians and actors to qualify as British Productions to use Eady Levy. If further work is carried out as part of the co-development process, the agreement should confirm who owns the rights to this work. If co-producers share the costs of commissioning other work, make sure that rights become when co-development/production ends. Co-producers often agree that the rights remain with the producer who initiated the project, but with the obligation for that producer to reimburse the costs of the other co-producer. Due to the cost of cinema, many films shot outside the United States are international co-productions. Amélie, for example, plays in France and plays French actors, but many scenes were shot in a German film studio and the post-production was taken over by a German film company. [6] International co-productions open up new markets for films and television programmes and can increase the production of quality productions through the participation of equities. [7] It is important to determine which of the co-producers is primarily responsible for production and which, in turn, will involve production managers, lawyers and the project, from pre-production to machining and completion. The director of dialogue, Mickey Knox, recalled that many countries behind the old Iron Curtain were proposing lucrative deals to bring in US dollars and pounds sterling. In exchange for a portion of the profits or a direct payment, the host country would cover most of the local costs; with the film often credited as co-production.

[8] Sometimes, in co-productions, producers can agree on different credits for each area, which gives more importance to the producer in the region.

Comments are closed.